Quantcast
Channel: Comments on: Distracted driving is growing danger on BC roads
Browsing all 20 articles
Browse latest View live

By: Geoff

Let’s be honest. This problem could be quite easily rectified by fitting the same sensors to phones that vehicle navigation systems have the render them useless as soon as the vehicle is in motion. The...

View Article



By: Allan

Violators should have their vehicles impounded for 30 days and the driver fined $500 for a first offence and $1000 for additional offences..

View Article

By: Allan Ashby

Seconds count, especially at freeway speeds. Still, isn’t it curious how a phone – even hands-free – is a distraction, while a speedometer is not? Listen to the traffic reports. How many times do you...

View Article

By: Tommy

It’s the distracted driving law that’s causing all these fatalities. Before the law people would use the electronic device looking up at traffic. Since the laws were in place, people had to hide their...

View Article

By: Drake Powell

Saw it today. Lady in a car with a little kid in the back seat, holding the phone at her mouth, not to the ear.

View Article


By: Glen

I think your on to something!

View Article

By: Colin Parkinson

So the law is a failure? the number of distracted drivers is on the increase since the law came in? Well the police can lead by example and not talk on their cellphones or have their head buried into...

View Article

By: Crazy Drivers

What about all the huge signs like the one Jimmy Pattison erected on the Surrey side of Pattullo Bridge and the huge signs New Westminster erected on our side of the bridge? That is not contributing to...

View Article


By: Tommy

Lol, you know why they haven’t implemented something like that because there isn’t a way to tell which phone belongs to the driver vs passengers.

View Article


By: Samuel

Its always those darned teenagers with their loud music and fast driving too! Back in my day you wouldn’t drive until you earned it walking 25 miles to and from school up hill for 22 years. Back then...

View Article

By: Geoff

Let’s be honest. This problem could be quite easily rectified by fitting the same sensors to phones that vehicle navigation systems have the render them useless as soon as the vehicle is in motion. The...

View Article

By: Allan

Violators should have their vehicles impounded for 30 days and the driver fined $500 for a first offence and $1000 for additional offences..

View Article

By: Allan Ashby

Seconds count, especially at freeway speeds. Still, isn’t it curious how a phone – even hands-free – is a distraction, while a speedometer is not? Listen to the traffic reports. How many times do you...

View Article


By: Tommy

It’s the distracted driving law that’s causing all these fatalities. Before the law people would use the electronic device looking up at traffic. Since the laws were in place, people had to hide their...

View Article

By: Drake Powell

Saw it today. Lady in a car with a little kid in the back seat, holding the phone at her mouth, not to the ear.

View Article


By: Glen

I think your on to something!

View Article

By: Colin Parkinson

So the law is a failure? the number of distracted drivers is on the increase since the law came in? Well the police can lead by example and not talk on their cellphones or have their head buried into...

View Article


By: Crazy Drivers

What about all the huge signs like the one Jimmy Pattison erected on the Surrey side of Pattullo Bridge and the huge signs New Westminster erected on our side of the bridge? That is not contributing to...

View Article

By: Tommy

Lol, you know why they haven’t implemented something like that because there isn’t a way to tell which phone belongs to the driver vs passengers.

View Article

By: Samuel

Its always those darned teenagers with their loud music and fast driving too! Back in my day you wouldn’t drive until you earned it walking 25 miles to and from school up hill for 22 years. Back then...

View Article
Browsing all 20 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images